**Original edited on 8/11/25 to add after original article at bottom.
Should the MCDC give $233,137 to a multi-use development established in 2008, with restaurants, bars,
businesses, and green space, for a new fire suppression system for its parking
garage? The ask represents nearly 72% of the total cost. If I'm not mistaken, this is a first.
The rationale is quoted below in its application to the MCDC:
“All expenses, including structural maintenance, system repairs, insurance, and
regulatory compliance, are borne entirely by the private property owners
through the Association. Over the past three years, the Association’s operating
budget has averaged $406,000 annually, much of which has been consumed by the
compounding costs of maintaining the aging and unreliable fire suppression
system. The Association has depleted its reserves and levied multiple special
assessments to meet these obligations, placing a significant and unsustainable
financial burden on local stakeholders.
This situation represents a unique disconnect. While the
garage serves a broad public benefit, supporting restaurants, retail
establishments…it is funded exclusively through private means. The public at
large has long benefited from the infrastructure without assuming any
proportionate cost share for its upkeep. This grant request seeks to partially
rebalance that equation by asking MCDC to contribute toward the public’s pro
rata share of a critical life safety system that protects both public users and
the viability of key community destinations.”
A private entity wants customers at its restaurants, bars,
and retail, but also wants taxpayer sales tax dollars to pay for customer parking. This
private entity is Adriatica. Does that change your answer to the original
question? The MCDC looks very open to this cost. Does that mean all existing businesses will get the same response when they come asking for the same types of maintenance grants?
See the complete application here. Watch the video here.
** This is a quote for the garage work included in the original application packet. For some reason, the quote was given to the recently former mayor's, Geore Fuller, construction company. He must be in some official capacity in the HOA to be getting quotes sent to him.
Just think last year the Heard was denied money to fix their deck.
ReplyDelete